Disposed¶11

Anees Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC19 Apr 2026WRIA/2164/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Penal rent calculation; government premises vacated; objection to quantum of about Rs.11 lakh; writ petitions disposed of with direction to consider representation; 48-hour Dasti representation; decision within 3 weeks; timeline non-binding on default; Allahabad High Court; WRIT - A No. 2164 of 2026; connected Writ-A No. 2462 of 2026; Anees Ahmad v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others; no statute or precedent cited or discussed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner may submit details of his objection to the penal rent calculation by representation within 48 hours (Dasti service); respondents to examine the calculation and pass a specific order accepting or rejecting it within three weeks thereafter; timeline not binding in case of default. ¶11

Anees Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 2164 of 2026

¶3

Anees Ahmad

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others	.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Nawal Kishor Mishra, Rahul Misra : Sumit Suri, C.S.C.

¶6

With Writ-A No.2462 of 2026 .

¶7

Court No. - 32

¶8

HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

¶9

Heard Sri Nawal Kishor Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sumit Suri, learned counsel for the respondents.

¶10

This Court is being unnecessary burdened with two writ petitions when all the grounds can be taken in one writ petition.

¶11

The petitioner has already vacated Government premises and now only issue is whether calculation made by respondents for penal rent which is about Rs.11 lakh is correct or not since petitioner has objected it, though details of it are not specifically mentioned, still in the interest of justice both the writ petitions are disposed of with an observation that respondents will look into the calculation of the petitioner and for that liberty is granted to the respondent so that concerned authority may pass a specific order whether to accept it or not within a short period..

¶12

In case, petitioner provides all details by way of a representation within 48 hours, by way of a Dasti Service, concern respondent will take a decision within a period of 3 weeks thereafter. In case of default, responders are not required to follow direction of time line.

¶13

(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)

¶14

April 20, 2026 SB

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anees Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anees Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Awasthi vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Vinay Kumar Shukla vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Girish Chand Joshi vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Lallan and Others Vs D.D.C.and Others

Anees Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mamta Chandel Vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others