Interlocutory listing order only: impleadment of District Basic Education Officer, Firozabad as respondent no.6 permitted, respondents 3 and 5 to be deleted, and the writ petition put up afresh on a later date. No substantive decision or proposition of general application is recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 19536 of 2025
Chandni Rathour
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Ajay Kumar Yadav .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
Court No. - 52
HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead "District Basic Education Officer, District-Firozabad" as respondent no.6 and delete the respondent nos.3 and 5 in the array of parties during the course of the day.
Put up this case on 16.01.2026, as fresh, showing the name of Mr. Suresh Kumar Maurya as counsel for the newly impleaded respondent no.6.
(Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)
January 7, 2026
Jitendra/-
Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandni Rathour
State Of U.P.
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
