Bharat Kumar Mishra and 127 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Ayush Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Short interlocutory order allowing amendment application in a writ petition; amendment sought to challenge new facts introduced via respondents' counter affidavit; amendment held formal and consequential; no objection by learned Standing Counsel; timelines fixed for amended writ petition and counter affidavit; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.; May 13, 2026; no statute or precedent discussed.
What did the court decide?
Amendment application I.A. No. 3 of 2026 allowed; petitioner directed to incorporate the necessary amendment in the writ petition within one week and file the amended copy within a further period of one week; learned Standing Counsel directed to file counter affidavit to the amended writ petition within four weeks thereafter. ¶15