Nitish v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS could not be taken up due to paucity of time; matter directed to be listed as fresh on 24.02.2026.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9843 of 2025
Nitish
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anuj Kumar, Dharmendra Kumar, Ram Shiromani Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
- Due to paucity of time, the matter could not be taken up today.
- Put up as fresh on 24.02.2026.
(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)
February 17, 2026
Kushal
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Nitish
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/9843/2025
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court