Disposed¶9

Satyam Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC16 Feb 2026NABAIL/939/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Court No. 72; anticipatory bail under S. 482 BNSS; Satyam Kumar Pandey (applicant, counsel Rahul Saxena and Sunita Chauhan) versus State of U.P. (opposite party, G.A.); single-judge order of Jitendra Kumar Sinha, J. dated 16.02.2026 listing the matter afresh on 18.2.2026 at 02:00 p.m.; no merits decision, no cases cited, no quantum.

What did the court decide?

Direction to put up the case as fresh on 18.2.2026 at 02.00 p.m.; no substantive relief adjudicated. ¶9

Satyam Kumar Pandey vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 939 of 2026

Satyam Kumar Pandey

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Rahul Saxena, Sunita Chauhan
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 72

¶8

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶9

As prayed, put up this case as fresh on 18.2.2026 at 02.00 p.m.

¶10

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶11

February 16, 2026

¶12

Madhurima

¶13

Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Satyam Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyam Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aman Yadav Sipahi Alias Utkarsh vs State of U.P. and Another

Shyam Pyare Tiwari vs State of U.P.

Daya Shankar Prajapati and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Shamim vs State of U.P.

Soni vs State of U.P. and Another

Karmaveer Singh @ Kishan Veer vs State of U.P. and Another