Disposed¶10

Manju Jaiswal v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC23 Apr 2026NABAIL/3864/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS; applicant Manju Jaiswal; State of U.P.; Case Crime No. 427 of 2024; Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 108 BNS; Police Station Sigra, District Varanasi; personal bond and two sureties; bail conditions including no tampering, no inducement, no leaving India, no pressurising witnesses; cancellation on default; AGA to obtain instructions; listed fresh on 08.05.2026; order dated April 23, 2026; Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.; Court No. 72.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail granted till the next date of listing (08.05.2026), in the event of arrest, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions (i)-(v); matter listed fresh for AGA instructions; prosecution at liberty to seek cancellation on breach of conditions. ¶10

Manju Jaiswal vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶10

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Manju Jaiswal, involved in Case Crime No. 427 of 2024 under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 108 BNS, Police Station Sigra, District Varanasi, is entitled to release on interim anticipatory bail in the event of arrest.

¶10

Court's answer

Till the next date of listing, in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on interim anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer/Court concerned, subject to conditions: (i) not tampering with evidence and appearing before the trial Court; (ii) no inducement, threat or promise to dissuade disclosure of facts; (iii) co-operation during trial and non-misuse of bail liberty; (iv) not leaving India without prior permission of the Court; and (v) not pressurizing/intimidating prosecution witnesses.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

The application is to be put up as fresh on 08.05.2026 to enable the Learned AGA to obtain instructions, the AGA having stated that he had not received instructions.

¶9

Key takeaways

In default of any of the imposed conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application for cancellation of the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.ratio¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory bail – S. 482 BNSS – Allahabad High Court (Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.), by order dated April 23, 2026, granted interim anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 427 of 2024 (Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 108 BNS, Police Station Sigra, District Varanasi) till the next date of listing, in the event of arrest, on a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions against tampering with evidence, inducement/threat to witnesses, misuse of liberty, leaving India without permission and pressurising prosecution witnesses; Learned AGA had not received instructions, so the matter was put up as fresh on 08.05.2026; on default of conditions the prosecution may apply for cancellation.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3864 of 2026

¶3

Manju Jaiswal

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another		...	..Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Brijesh Kumar Maurya	Srivastava,	Harikesh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 72

¶7

HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

¶8

Learned AGA states that he has not received instructions.

¶9

Put up as fresh on 08.05.2026 to enable Learned AGA to obtain instructions in the matter.

¶10

Till the next date of listing, in the event of arrest of the applicant- Manju Jaiswal , involved in the Case Crime No.427 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 108 BNS, Police Station- Sigra, District Varanasi, she shall be released on interim anticipatory bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶11

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that she would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶13

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶14

NABAIL No. 3864 of 2026

¶15

¶16

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶17

(v) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness;

¶18

In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶19

(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)

¶20

April 23, 2026

¶21

A. Pandey

¶22

Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Manju Jaiswal v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manju Jaiswal v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Juvenile X Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Adnan vs State of U.P. and Another

X Juvenile vs State of U.P. and Another

Priti Sagar vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Dinesh Yadav vs State of U.P.

Abdul Kadeer vs State of U.P.