Dinesh Yadav vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

Dinesh Yadav vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant till the next date of listing (08.05.2026), on personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions (no tampering with evidence; appearance before trial court unless exempted; no inducement, threat or promise; cooperation during trial and no misuse of liberty; no leaving India without prior permission; no pressurising/intimidating prosecution witnesses); the substantive application is to be heard fresh on 08.05.2026.

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Dinesh Yadav, involved in Case Crime No. 116 of 2026 (Sections 108, 352, 351(3), Police Station Gagaha, District Gorakhpur), is entitled to interim anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS.

Court's answer

Till the next date of listing (08.05.2026), in the event of arrest, the applicant Dinesh Yadav shall be released on interim anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned, subject to the enumerated conditions.

Ratio / Principle

In default of any of the interim bail conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application for cancellation of the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory bail — S. 482 BNSS — High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.), by order dated April 23, 2026, granted interim anticipatory bail to applicant Dinesh Yadav, involved in Case Crime No. 116 of 2026 under Sections 108, 352, 351(3), Police Station Gagaha, District Gorakhpur, till the next date of listing (08.05.2026), on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer/police station or Court concerned, subject to conditions: no tampering with evidence and appearance before the trial Court unless exempted; no inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts; cooperation during trial and no misuse of liberty of bail; no leaving India without prior permission of the Court; no pressurising/intimidating prosecution witnesses. In default of any condition, the prosecution is at liberty to file an appropriate application for cancellation of the interim anticipatory bail. Learned AGA had not received instructions; the matter was directed to be listed fresh on 08.05.2026.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3845 of 2026

Dinesh Yadav

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

	.....	Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Kailash Choudhary, Nitesh Chaudhari	Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

Court No. - 72

HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

Learned AGA states that he has not received instructions.

Put up as fresh on 08.05.2026 to enable Learned AGA to obtain instructions in the matter.

Till the next date of listing, in the event of arrest of the applicant- Dinesh Yadav , involved in the Case Crime No.116 of 2026, under Section 108, 352, 351(3), Police Station- Gagaha, District Gorakhpur, he shall be released on interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail.

NABAIL No. 3845 of 2026

2

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

(v) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness;

In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)

April 23, 2026

A. Pandey

Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad