Partly allowed¶¶12

Dharmendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC28 Apr 2026NABAIL/3489/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim anticipatory bail; Section 482 BNSS; offences under Sections 85, 108, 115(2), 352 BNS; case crime No. 133 of 2025; P.S. Earch, District Jhansi; Dharmendra Singh v. State of U.P.; NABAIL No. 3489 of 2026; personal bond and two sureties; conditions of interim bail; liberty to prosecute to seek cancellation on default; next listing 28.04.2026; Allahabad High Court; Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.; order dated April 10, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant in the event of arrest, on personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions, till the next date of listing; matter to be put up as fresh on 28.04.2026. ¶¶12

Dharmendra Singh vs State of U.P. — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶12

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Dharmendra Singh should be released on interim anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in case crime No. 133 of 2025, P.S. Earch, District Jhansi, under Sections 85, 108, 115(2) and 352 BNS.

¶¶12

Court's answer

Till the next date of listing, in the event of arrest, the applicant Dharmendra Singh shall be released on interim anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned.

¶¶12

Ratio / Principle

The interim anticipatory bail is subject to conditions (no tampering with evidence and appearance before the trial Court; no inducement, threat or promise to dissuade disclosure; co-operation during trial and no misuse of liberty; no leaving India without prior permission; no pressurising/intimidating prosecution witnesses), and in default of any condition the prosecution is at liberty to file an appropriate application for cancellation of the interim anticipatory bail.

¶¶21

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.), order dated April 10, 2026, in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. 3489 of 2026, Dharmendra Singh v. State of U.P.: interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant in the event of arrest in case crime No. 133 of 2025, P.S. Earch, District Jhansi, alleging offences under Sections 85, 108, 115(2) and 352 BNS, till the next date of listing, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer concerned, subject to conditions (no tampering with evidence and appearance before the trial Court; no inducement, threat or promise; co-operation during trial and no misuse of liberty; no leaving India without prior permission; no pressurising/intimidating prosecution witnesses). In default of any condition, the prosecution is at liberty to apply for cancellation of the interim anticipatory bail. Vakalatnama of the informant's counsel (Shri Ram Bahadur Kushwaha) taken on record; learned AGA had no instructions. Matter to be put up as fresh on 28.04.2026.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3489 of 2026

Dharmendra Singh

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Abhinav Trivedi, Adarsh Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 72

¶8

HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

¶9

Vakalatnama filed by Shri Ram Bahadur Kushwaha, Learned counsel for the informant, in Court today, is taken on the record.

¶10

Learned AGA states that he has not received instructions.

¶11

Put up as fresh on 28.04.2026.

¶12

Till the next date of listing, in the event of arrest of the applicant- Dharmendra Singh , involved in the case crime No.133 of 2025 under Section 85, 108, 115(2), 352 BNS, P.S. Earch, District Jhansi, he shall be released on interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶13

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶14

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶15

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the

¶16

NABAIL No. 3489 of 2026

¶17

¶18

liberty of bail.

¶19

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶20

(v) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness;

¶21

In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶22

(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)

¶23

April 10, 2026

¶24

A. Pandey

¶25

Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dharmendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mahipal and Others Vs State

Indresh Singh Chauhan vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashu Sharma Alias Avinash Bharadwaj vs State of U.P.

Guddu @ Sachin Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Rahul vs State of U.P. and Another

Devendra Singh @ Devendra Singh Parihar vs State of U.P.