Disposed¶10

Rahul v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC28 Apr 2026NABAIL/4029/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. 4029 of 2026 (NABAIL No. 4029 of 2026); Rahul v. State of U.P. and Another; interim anticipatory bail granted; Case Crime No. 99 of 2024; Sections 69, 351(3) BNS; Police Station Baburi; District Chandauli; personal bond and two sureties; bail conditions; cancellation on default; next listing 13.05.2026; Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.; order dated April 28, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant Rahul till the next date of listing (13.05.2026), in the event of arrest, on a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to stated conditions; the application is to be listed fresh on 13.05.2026 and is not finally disposed of. ¶10

Rahul vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶10

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Rahul, apprehending arrest in Case Crime No. 99 of 2024 under Sections 69, 351(3) BNS, Police Station Baburi, District Chandauli, is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS.

¶2

Court's answer

Till the next date of listing (13.05.2026), in the event of arrest, the applicant Rahul shall be released on interim anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 99 of 2024 on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned, subject to conditions (no tampering with evidence and appearance before the trial Court unless exempted; no inducement, threat or promise to dissuade disclosure of facts; co-operation during trial and no misuse of the liberty of bail; no leaving India without prior permission of the Court; no pressurising/intimidating prosecution witnesses).

¶10

Ratio / Principle

In default of any of the bail conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application for cancellation of the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory bail — S. 482 BNSS — interim anticipatory bail granted to applicant Rahul in the event of arrest in Case Crime No. 99 of 2024, Sections 69, 351(3) BNS, Police Station Baburi, District Chandauli, till the next date of listing (13.05.2026), on personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned, subject to conditions: no tampering with evidence and appearance before the trial Court unless exempted; no inducement, threat or promise to dissuade disclosure of facts; co-operation during trial and no misuse of the liberty of bail; no leaving India without prior permission of the Court; no pressurising/intimidating prosecution witnesses — Learned AGA to obtain instructions; on default of any condition, prosecution at liberty to seek cancellation of the interim anticipatory bail. (Allahabad High Court, Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J., order dated April 28, 2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 4029 of 2026

¶3

Rahul

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Manish Kumar, Malik	Mohammad Ahmar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 72

¶7

HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

¶8

Learned AGA states that he has not received instructions.

¶9

Put up as fresh on 13.05.2026 to enable Learned AGA to obtain instructions in the matter.

¶10

Till the next date of listing, in the event of arrest of the applicant- Rahul , involved in the Case Crime No. 99 of 2024, under Section 69, 351(3) BNS, Police Station- Baburi, District Chandauli, he shall be released on interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶11

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶13

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶14

NABAIL No. 4029 of 2026

¶15

¶16

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶17

(v) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness;

¶18

In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶19

(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)

¶20

April 28, 2026

¶21

A. Pandey

¶22

Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rahul v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahipal and Others Vs State

Indresh Singh Chauhan vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashu Sharma Alias Avinash Bharadwaj vs State of U.P.

Dharmendra Singh vs State of U.P.

Guddu @ Sachin Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Devendra Singh @ Devendra Singh Parihar vs State of U.P.