Disposed¶11

Pramod Kumar Tyagi v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC12 May 2026NA529/2363/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 529 BNSS application; expeditious disposal direction; Section 138 N.I. Act complaint case; six-month timeline from certified copy; bailable warrant against accused; no objection by A.G.A.; Allahabad High Court; Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Sadabad, District Hathras; unnecessary adjournments barred.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court to decide Complaint Case No. 1217 of 2024 expeditiously, preferably within six months from production of a certified copy of the order, absent legal impediment and without unnecessary adjournments; the application was disposed of with this direction. ¶11

Pramod Kumar Tyagi vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2363 of 2026

¶2

Pramod Kumar Tyagi

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another	....	.Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Ashutosh Shukla, Chandra Tiwari, Siblu Panday : G.A.	Bhushan

¶5

Court No. - 84

¶6

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. representing the State and perused the record.

¶8

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer for expeditious disposal of Complaint Case No. 1217 of 2024 (Pramod Kumar Tyagi Vs. Anand J.P.), under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station Sadabad, District Hathras, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sadabad, District Hathras, within stipulated time.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the learned trial court has issued bailable warrant against the accused in the matter.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the innocuous prayer of the applicant.

¶11

In view of the above, it is directed that the learned trial court concerned shall make all endeavour to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

¶12

With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of .

¶13

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

¶14

May 12, 2026 Kashifa

¶15

Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pramod Kumar Tyagi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar Tyagi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

X-Juvenile Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mandeep Singh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Juvenile- a Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shahzad Rahman vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rama Devi and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Chandra Kala Singh vs State of U.P. and 3 Others