Disposed¶10

Rajpati Yadav v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC30 Mar 2026NA529/1408/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J.; 30.03.2026; Application U/S 529 BNSS No. 1408 of 2026; Rajpati Yadav v. State of U.P. and 5 others; expedited trial direction; speedy disposal; Case No. 624 of 2021 (State Vs. Suraj Singh and others); Case Crime No. 143 of 2020; Sections 147, 323, 452, 504, 506 IPC; Police Station Handia; District Prayagraj; ACJM Court No. 8, Allahabad; no unnecessary adjournments; disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 8, Allahabad to decide Case No. 624 of 2021 (State Vs. Suraj Singh and others) in accordance with law, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party, as expeditiously as possible, if there is no legal impediment. ¶10

Rajpati Yadav vs State of U.P. and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1408 of 2026

¶3

Rajpati Yadav

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus
State Of U.P. And 5 Others	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) :	Pradeep Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :	G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 50

¶7

HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

¶9

By means of this application, the only prayer made by the applicant is that a direction be issued to the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.8, Allahabad to decide the Case No.624 of 2021 (State Vs. Suraj Singh and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 143 of 2020, under Sections 147, 323, 452, 504, 506 I.P.C. Police StationHandia, District- Prayagraj, pending before him, expeditiously within a short stipulated period.

¶10

Considering the facts of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the applicant's case, this application U/s 529 B.N.S.S. is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties as expeditiously as possible, if there is no legal impediment.

¶11

(Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.)

¶12

March 30, 2026

¶13

Krishna*

¶14

Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajpati Yadav v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajpati Yadav v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rajpati Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Mohit @ Sanju vs State of U.P. and Another

Nitesh Pandey Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pintu Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Pintu Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Neha Jaiswal vs State of U.P. and 6 Others