Satish and 7 Others vs State of U.P. and 6 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Satish and 7 Others vs State of U.P. and 6 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Interim order: further proceedings of S.T. No. 145 of 2018 stayed against the applicants till the next date of listing; two weeks' time granted to file supplementary affidavit annexing the original/certified copy of the compromise; matter to be listed fresh on 03.04.2026. Application not finally decided.

Issue for consideration

Whether, in view of the compromise dated 13.11.2025 settling the dispute between the parties, further proceedings of S.T. No. 145 of 2018 should be stayed against the applicants pending consideration of the application under Section 528 BNSS.

Court's answer

Till the next date of listing, further proceedings of S.T. No. 145 of 2018 shall remain stayed against the applicants.

Ratio / Principle

Two weeks' time granted to learned counsel for the applicants to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the original/certified copy of the compromise.

Key takeaways

Vakalatnama filed by Sri S.K. Singh, Advocate on behalf of private opposite party no. 2, is taken on record.ratio¶10
Matter to be put up on 03.04.2026 as a fresh case showing the name of Sri S.K. Singh as counsel for the opposite party.ratio¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court, Court No. 74 (Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.), order dated January 21, 2026 in Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 690 of 2026, Satish And 7 Others v. State Of U.P. And 6 Others. Learned counsel for both parties submitted that the parties settled their dispute arising out of offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 324, 325, 307 of I.P.C. on the basis of a compromise dated 13.11.2025. Vakalatnama of Sri S.K. Singh, Advocate for private opposite party no. 2, was taken on record. Two weeks' time was granted to the applicants' counsel to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the original/certified copy of the compromise. Till the next date of listing, further proceedings of S.T. No. 145 of 2018, arising out of Case Crime No. 408 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 324, 325, 307 of I.P.C., P.S. Hayat Nagar, District Sambhal, pending before the Sessions Judge, Sambhal at Chandausi, were stayed against the applicants. Matter to be put up fresh on 03.04.2026.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 690 of 2026

Satish And 7 Others

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 6 Others	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Krishna Kumar Singh : Sunil Kumar Singh, G.A.

Court No. - 79

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

Sri Krishna Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State.

Learned counsel for the applicants hands up the supplementary affidavit annexing the original compromise entered into between the parties, the same is taken on record.

It is jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the trial is continuing. The allegation is of 307 IPC.

On query about the status of the trial, the evidence adduced by the injured, on whose injuries the charge under Section 307 IPC is framed, learned counsel seeks time to file supplementary affidavit.

List on 14.05.2026.

Interim order is extended till further orders.

(Avnish Saxena,J.)

April 3, 2026 Abhishek Sri.

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad