Dismissed¶11

Shahid @ Pappu and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Mar 2026NA528/5717/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 5717 of 2026; Shahid @ Pappu v. State of U.P.; Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.; decided March 18, 2026; Section 528 BNSS quashing petition; Sections 191(2), 190, 109, 115(2), 329(3) BNS; case crime No. 571 of 2024; Case No. 15187 of 2025; PS Chandpur, District Bijnor; cognizance/summoning order dated 31.10.2025; Chief Judicial Magistrate Bijnor; dismissed as not pressed; liberty to approach competent court; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction; Office directed to return certified copies of documents to counsel for the applicants after retaining xerox copies. ¶11

Shahid @ Pappu and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 5717 of 2026

¶3

Shahid @ Pappu And 3 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another			.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Manoj Kumar Tirpathi	Tripathi,	Vinod Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 74

¶7

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

¶8

Sri Manoj Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Abhishek Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶9

The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicants to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 15187 of 2025, arising out of case crime No. 571 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 190, 109, 115(2), 329(3), B.N.S., Police Station- Chandpur, District Bijnor as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 31.10.2025, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bijnor.

¶10

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction.

¶11

The instant application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction.

¶12

Office shall return the certified copy of the documents to the learned counsel for the applicants, after retaining a xerox of the same.

¶13

March 18, 2026 T. Sinha

¶14

(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shahid @ Pappu and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahid @ Pappu and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jitendra Yadav and 11 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ishma Khatoon and Another vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others

Smt Riya Shah and Another vs State of Up and 3 Others

Smt. Savita and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Jitendra Yadav and 11 Others vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Aniruddh Alias Raja Alias Mama Vs State of U.P.