Disposed¶16

Amresh Yadav and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 May 2026NA528/20153/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

S.528 BNSS quashing application; section 12 Domestic Violence Act complaint; matrimonial dispute between husband, in-laws and wife; mediation and conciliation referral direction; quashing relief refused; Allahabad High Court; Deepak Verma, J.; disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Quashing relief refused; application disposed of with directions that the learned Magistrate/court concerned consider the applicants' prayer and give an opportunity to both parties to settle the matter before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. ¶16

Amresh Yadav and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Domestic Violence | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 20153 of 2026

¶3

Amresh Yadav And 5 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ambuj Pandey, Atul Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 74

¶7

HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶9

This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicants to quash the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No.878 of 2023 Sanju Yadav Vs. Amresh Yadav and others under section 12 Domestic Violence Act, Police Station Robertsganj, District Sonebhadra as well as order dated 17.03.2026 passed by Civil Judge (J.D.) F.T.C. (CAW), Sonebhadra.

¶10

Applicants' counsel submits that applicant No.1 is husband and rest of the applicants are in-laws of opposite party no.2. Marriage of applicant No.1 was solemnized with opposite party no.2 on 24.05.2021, thereafter, opposite party no.2 was resided with the applicants but on account of some domestic dispute, she left her matrimonial house and started living in her parental house. Opposite party no.2 has filed various criminal proceeding against the applicants and applicants are contesting the proceeding. He further submits that there is chances to settle the matter between the parties if the matter is being referred to Mediation Centre.

¶11

In view of the above, the relief as sought by the applicants for quashing the proceeding in the instant application is refused.

¶12

Considering the argument advanced by applicants' counsel and perused the record, it is evident that submission of applicant's counsel can be

¶13

NA528 No. 20153 of 2026

¶14

¶15

accepted if applicants appear before trial court and raise chances of settlement between the parties and the matter be referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The learned Magistrate/court concerned shall consider the prayer of the applicants and give an opportunity to both the parties to settle the matter before Mediation and Conciliation Centre.

¶16

With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 528 BNSS stands disposed of.

¶17

(Deepak Verma,J.)

¶18

May 18, 2026 Nitin Verma

¶19

Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Amresh Yadav and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amresh Yadav and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Manoj Gupta @ Kuldeep Gupta and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Shivam @ Chhotu and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Manoj Gupta @ Kuldeep Gupta and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sumit Kumar and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ramakant and 3 Others Vs State of Up and 3 Others

Brahmadev and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another