Dismissed¶11

Sumit Kumar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 May 2026A482/8398/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Application U/S 482 No. 8398 of 2024; Sumit Kumar and 2 others v. State of U.P. and another; quashing application; non-compliance with mediation deposit direction (order dated 04.04.2024; mediation report dated 09.06.2024); interim order obtained and misused; statements under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C.; prima facie offence made out; no one appeared for applicants; no interference warranted; application dismissed; Deepak Verma, J.; May 18, 2026.

What did the court decide?

On perusal of the complaint and the statements recorded under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C., a prima facie offence is made out against the applicants. ¶9

Sumit Kumar and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8398 of 2024

¶3

Sumit Kumar And 2 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) :	Sanjay Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :	G.A., Sunil Kumar Singh

¶6

Court No. - 74

¶7

HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.

¶8

Case called out in revised list. No one appeared to press this application on behalf of applicants.

¶9

On perusal of record, it is evident that vide order dated 04.04.2024, the matter was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Allahabad. As per Mediation report dated 09.06.2024, the applicants have not complied the order dated 04.04.2024 with regard to deposit of money, hence the notices could not be issued to the opposite parties. On the requ est of the applicants, the matter was referred to Mediation and C onciliation Centre. In the garb of chances of settlement between the parties, the applicants got interim order and did not deposit amount before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre as directed by the Court. The act of the applicant is not fair and cannot be accepted. On perusal of complaint as well as statement recorded under Sections 200 Cr.P.C. and 202 Cr.P.C., prima facie, offence is made out against the applicants. The applicants have enjoyed the interim order.

¶10

No interference is warranted by this Court.

¶11

The application is, accordingly, dismissed .

¶12

(Deepak Verma,J.)

¶13

May 18, 2026 Meenu Singh

¶14

Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sumit Kumar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumit Kumar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Gupta @ Kuldeep Gupta and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Shivam @ Chhotu and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Manoj Gupta @ Kuldeep Gupta and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ramakant and 3 Others Vs State of Up and 3 Others

Brahmadev and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Deepak and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another