Disposed¶18

Firoz v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC13 May 2026NA528/19901/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Firoz v. State of U.P. and Another; APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 19901 of 2026; Allahabad High Court; quashing of NBW; non-bailable warrant kept in abeyance for three weeks; conditional appearance before trial court; Sections 302, 147 IPC; Case Crime No. 415 of 2014; Police Station Tajganj, District Agra; Session Trial No. 608 of 2014; Additional District Judge, Court No. 1, Agra; no further time for appearance; Vivek Kumar Singh, J.; decided May 14, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of with the NBW dated 17.1.2024 kept in abeyance for three weeks, conditional on the applicant appearing before the court concerned within the time fixed; on appearance the NBW shall not be further executed, and on failure to appear or participate in the trial it shall be executed without delay. ¶18

Firoz Vs State of U.P. and Another — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 19901 of 2026

¶3

Firoz

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Vikash Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 80

¶7

HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶9

The present application has been filed by applicants for quashing the NBW order dated 17.1.2024 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 1, Agra in Session Trial No. 608 of 2014 (State vs. Firoz and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 415 of 2014, under Sections 302, 147 IPC, Police Station Tajganj, District Agra pending before Additional District Judge, Court No. 1, Agra.

¶10

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is ready to appear before the court concerned and on account of compelling circumstances, he could not appear on the date fixed before the court below therefore, as a result of the same, non bailable warrant dated 17.1.2024 has been issued against the applicant.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant undertakes to participate in the trial court's proceedings and he shall remain present before the court concerned unless the personal presence of the applicant is exempted by the court below. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant will cooperate in the trial court's proceedings.

¶12

On the other hand learned AGA submits that due to non appearance of the applicant on several dates, the leaned trial Court proceeded to issue

¶13

NA528 No. 19901 of 2026

¶14

¶15

non bailable warrant against the applicant.

¶16

In view of the facts of the case, this Court deems it fit that non bailable warrant issued against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance for a period of three weeks and applicant shall appear before the court concerned within the time fixed by this Court. If, the applicant appears before the court concerned, non bailable warrant shall not be further executed. However, if the applicant fails to appear or participate in the trial proceeding within the time fixed by this Court, non bailable warrant shall be executed against the applicant without delay.

¶17

It is made clear that no further time for appearance before the court concerned shall be granted by this Court.

¶18

In view of the aforesaid, this application is disposed of.

¶19

(Vivek Kumar Singh,J.)

¶20

May 14, 2026 Lalit Shukla

¶21

Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Firoz v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Firoz v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Nafis and 2 Others vs State of Up and Another

Maiser@ Mahsar and Anotehr vs State of Up and Another

Shyam vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashish Vs State of U.P.

Suraj Harijan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashish vs State of U.P.