Disposed¶18

Ashish v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC14 May 2026NA528/19794/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail; sureties; personal bond; common sureties across multiple criminal cases; inability to furnish sureties; indigent undertrial; Section 528 B.N.S.S.; Section 528 BNSS; Sections 140(1), 103(1), 238, 64(1), 70(1), 61(2A) BNS; Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of UP; Supreme Court order relied upon; Case Crime No. 46 of 2025; Case Crime No. 144 of 2026; Police Station Budhana; District Muzaffar Nagar; Allahabad High Court; application disposed.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of with a direction that the two sureties of one case be permitted to act as sureties in all the aforesaid cases subject to furnishing of one personal bond, and that the personal bond submitted in one case be accepted in all the cases. ¶18

Ashish vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 19794 of 2026

¶3

Ashish

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus
State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 80

¶7

HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶9

The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with a prayer to issue a direction to the court concerned to release the applicant on bail on the basis of a personal bond and two sureties in following cases:-

¶10

"(i). Case Crime No. 46 of 2025, under Sections 140(1), 103(1), 238, 64(1), 70(1), 61(2A) BNS, Police Station Budhana, District Muzaffar Nagar

¶11

(ii). Case Crime No. 144 of 2026, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Budhana, District Muzaffar Nagar."

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been languishing in jail since 9.4.2026. He is a very poor person and he cannot arrange two sureties in each case. The last bail order was passed in favour of the applicant on 30.4.2026 but he could not arrange two sureties in each case, therefore, he has been languishing in jail.

¶13

Learned counsel for the applicant placed reliance on the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.89148915/2018 (Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of UP) , wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court disposed of the said case directing that the sureties in one of the case shall be good enough for

¶14

NA528 No. 19794 of 2026

¶15

¶16

sureties in all the cases.

¶17

Considering the submissions made at the bar and on perusal of the said judgment, it is directed that the two sureties of one case shall be permitted to act as sureties in all the aforesaid cases subject to furnishing of one personal bond. The personal bond submitted by the applicant in one of the case shall be accepted in all the aforesaid cases.

¶18

The application is disposed of.

¶19

(Vivek Kumar Singh,J.)

¶20

May 14, 2026

¶21

Lalit Shukla

¶22

Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ashish v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashish v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Suraj Harijan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashish Vs State of U.P.

Firoz Vs State of U.P. and Another

Firoz vs State of U.P. and Another

Arun Kumar Sinha Vs State of U.P. and Another

Arun Kumar Sinha vs State of U.P. and Another