Dismissed¶14

Smt Sushma v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 May 2026NA528/16085/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Court No. 76; APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 16085 of 2026; Smt Sushma v. State of U.P. and Another; quashing of criminal proceedings; Section 528 BNSS; Section 420 IPC; Sections 3/4/5/6 Price Chits and Money Circulation Scheme Act; Case Crime No. 401 of 2023; Criminal Case No. 3034 of 2024; Chief Judicial Magistrate Baghpat; summoning order dated 23.05.2024; PW-1 examined; no discharge application; dismissed as not pressed; liberty to file fresh proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file an appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. ¶14

Smt Sushma Vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 16085 of 2026

¶3

Smt Sushma

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another		....	.Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Arpit Malviya, Malviya : G.A.	Awadhesh	Kumar

¶6

Court No. - 76

¶7

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

¶8

Supplementary affidavit filed today, which is taken on record.

¶9

Sri A.K. Malviya, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pusp Raj Singh, brief holder for the State are present.

¶10

The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 3034 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No. 401 of 2023, under Section 420 of I.P.C. and Section 3/4/5/6 of Price Chits and Money Circulation Scheme Act, Police Station- Baghpat, District- Baghpat, as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 23.05.2024 pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant fairly admits that statement of the prosecution witness (PW-1) has been recorded during trial and the present applicant has not filed any discharge application with regard to offence as alleged against him.

¶12

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file an appropriate application/ proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction.

¶13

Certified copy of the order may be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining a xerox thereof.

¶14

In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the

¶15

NA528 No. 16085 of 2026

¶16

¶17

aforesaid liberty. May 18, 2026 Ishan

¶18

(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)

¶19