Disposed¶14

Amit @ Amardeep and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC9 Apr 2026NA528/14686/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of chargesheet and cognizance/summoning order refused; application under S. 528 BNSS disposed; BNS Ss. 115(2), 110; Case Crime No.182 of 2025; P.S. Jasrana, District Firozabad; pending before ACJM Shikohabad; bail direction per Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I., 2021 (10) SCC 773; 15-day surrender window; no coercive action for 15 days; Allahabad High Court, single judge, decided April 10, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Quashing prayer refused; application disposed of with liberty to the applicants to surrender within 15 days and apply for bail, with a direction that the bail application be decided expeditiously in accordance with Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I., 2021 (10) SCC 773, and that no coercive action be taken against the applicants for 15 days. ¶14

Amit @ Amardeep and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶14

Issue for consideration

Whether the chargesheet dated 01.07.2025, the cognizance/summoning order dated 15.12.2025 and the entire proceedings of Case No.51215 of 2025 (arising out of Case Crime No.182 of 2025, under sections 115(2), 110 BNS) should be quashed.

¶10

Court's answer

No case for interference is made out; no ground is available in the application on which the impugned order, the chargesheet and the entire criminal proceedings of the said case can be set aside, and the quashing prayer is refused.

¶11

Ratio / Principle

Application disposed of with a direction that if the applicants surrender before the court concerned within 15 days and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I., 2021 (10) SCC 773.

¶14

Key takeaways

Till 15 days from the date of the order, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in pursuance of the aforesaid case.ratio¶17

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Saurabh Srivastava, J.) declined to interfere under S. 528 BNSS with the chargesheet dated 01.07.2025, the cognizance/summoning order dated 15.12.2025 and the entire proceedings of Case No.51215 of 2025 (State v. Amit @ Amardeep and others), arising out of Case Crime No.182 of 2025 under Ss. 115(2) and 110 BNS, P.S. Jasrana, District Firozabad, holding that no ground for quashing was made out. The application was disposed of with a direction that if the applicants surrender within 15 days and apply for bail, their bail application be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I., 2021 (10) SCC 773; no coercive action was to be taken against the applicants for 15 days.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14686 of 2026

¶3

Amit @ Amardeep And Another

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Rajnesh Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 77

¶8

HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶10

The present application has been filed for seeking quashing of chargesheet dated 01.07.2025, cognizance/summoning order dated 15.12.2025 and the entire proceeding of Case No.51215 of 2025 (State Vs. Amit @ Amardeep and others), arising out of Case Crime No.182 of 2025, under sections 115(2), 110 BNS, P.S. Jasrana, District- Firozabad, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shikohabad, District Firozabad.

¶11

On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with charge-sheet and entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside.

¶12

Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.

¶13

Lastly, learned counsel for applicants submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.

¶14

In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of 15 days from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. and Another , reported in 2021 (10) SCC 773 .

¶15

NA528 No. 14686 of 2026

¶16

¶17

However, it is made clear that till 15 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case.

¶18

April 10, 2026 Ashish/-

¶19

(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)

¶20

Digitally signed by :- ASHISH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Amit @ Amardeep and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit @ Amardeep and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Alishan vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashish and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Ghoore Lal and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Gaurav Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another

Amit @ Amardeep and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Naresh Tomar Alias Neetu Alias Nikki vs State of U.P. and Another