Disposed¶16

Gaurav Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC9 Apr 2026NA528/13277/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim order under Section 528 BNSS (Allahabad High Court, Saurabh Srivastava, J., 09.04.2026) in Gaurav Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another: compromise dated 14.03.2026 to be accepted and verified by the court concerned within four weeks; Registrar (Compliance) to serve order on VIII ACJM, Ghaziabad within three working days and obtain verification report; interim stay of coercive action in Case No.706 of 2023 / Case Crime No.317 of 2022, P.S. Bhojpur, District Ghaziabad; listed week commencing 11.05.2026; counsel: S.K. Mishra for applicant, G.A. for State.

What did the court decide?

Interim protection: no coercive action against the applicant till the next date of listing; direction to accept and verify the compromise within four weeks if filed; matter to be listed in the week commencing 11.05.2026. ¶16

Gaurav Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶16

Issue for consideration

Whether the written compromise dated 14.03.2026 should be accepted and verified by the learned court concerned in the presence of both parties. +1 more

¶13

Court's answer

If the compromise is filed, the learned court concerned is directed to accept the compromise and verify the same in presence of both parties within four weeks.

¶13

Ratio / Principle

Registrar (Compliance) is directed to ensure service of the order upon the learned court of VIII ACJM, Ghaziabad/concerned court within three working days and to place the verification report on record so the matter may be adjudicated on its basis.

¶14

Key takeaways

As an interim measure, till the next date of listing, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in pursuance of Case No.706 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No.317 of 2022, P.S. Bhojpur, District Ghaziabad.ratio¶16

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Saurabh Srivastava, J.), Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 13277 of 2026, Gaurav Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another, order dated April 9, 2026: On counsel's statement that the parties had already entered into a written compromise dated 14.03.2026, preferred before the learned court concerned, the Court directed that if the compromise is filed it be accepted and verified in presence of both parties within four weeks. Registrar (Compliance) was directed to ensure service of the order upon the court of VIII ACJM, Ghaziabad/concerned court within three working days and to place the verification report on record. Till the next date of listing (week commencing 11.05.2026), no coercive action was to be taken against the applicant in pursuance of Case No.706 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No.317 of 2022, P.S. Bhojpur, District Ghaziabad.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 13277 of 2026

Gaurav Sharma

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: S.K. Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 77

¶10

HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

¶12

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that parties have already entered into a compromise, which has been reduced in writing on dated 14.03.2026 and the same has been preferred before learned court concerned.

¶13

If the said compromise is filed, learned court concerned is hereby directed to accept the compromise and verify the same in presence of both the parties within four weeks from today.

¶14

Registrar (Compliance) is hereby directed to ensure service of this order upon learned court of VIII ACJM, Ghaziabad/concerned court within next three working days and place the verification report after receiving the same from learned court concerned in records, so that the matter may be adjudicated on the basis of verification report.

¶15

List this case in the week commencing 11.05.2026 .

¶16

Till the next date of listing, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in pursuance to Case No.706 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No.317 of 2022, P.S. Bhojpur, District- Ghaziabad.

¶17

April 9, 2026 Saif

¶18

(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)

¶19

Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Gaurav Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gaurav Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alishan vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashish and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Ghoore Lal and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Amit @ Amardeep and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Amit @ Amardeep and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Naresh Tomar Alias Neetu Alias Nikki vs State of U.P. and Another