Habeas corpus writ petition filed on behalf of the petitioner by her husband. Counsel stated the petitioner did not wish to press the petition; it was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn without further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 109 of 2026
Smt. Goldi Singh Thru. Her Husband Vishwas Kumar Maurya
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeev Dwivedi, Braj Nandan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
April 6, 2026 Himanshu
Digitally signed by :- HIMANSHU SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Goldi Singh Thru. Her Husband Vishwas Kumar Maurya
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
