Dismissed¶18

Sanjiv Kumar Kanaujiya v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Criminal revision – Delay condonation

Allahabad HC19 Apr 2026CRLRD/364/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Praveen Kumar Giri, J.) dismissed Criminal Revision Defective No. 364 of 2026, Sanjiv Kumar Kanaujiya v. State of U.P. and 2 Others, on limitation by order dated April 20, 2026. The delay of 2251 days in challenging the order dated 16.09.2019 of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Mirzapur was not condoned as the explanation was found insufficient; no costs were imposed. Counsel: Satya Nisth Dwivedi for the revisionist; G.A. for the opposite parties.

What did the court decide?

The reasons assigned in the delay condonation application are not sufficient to satisfactorily explain the inordinate delay. ¶12

Sanjiv Kumar Kanaujiya Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 364 of 2026

¶3

Sanjiv Kumar Kanaujiya

¶4

.....Revisionist(s)

¶5

Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Satya Nisth Dwivedi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 87

¶7

HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.

¶8

Order on Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 01 of 2026

¶9

Heard Sri Satya Nisth Dwivedi, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶10

Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the present criminal revision has been filed along with delay condonation application as there is delay of 2251 days in filing the present criminal revision.

¶11

The present criminal revision has been filed challenging the order dated 16.09.2019, whereby the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Mirzapur, directed the revisionist to appear before the Court; however, he has failed to comply with the said direction. The revisionist has also sought to challenge the subsequent proceedings, but has neither challenged any order granting interim or final maintenance nor annexed the relevant order sheets to demonstrate whether any proceedings have taken place after 16.09.2019.

¶12

The reasons assigned in the application seeking condonation of delay are not found sufficient to satisfactorily explain such inordinate delay.

¶13

This Court, taking a lenient view of the matter is not imposing any costs upon the revisionist or his counsel for wasting the valuable time of the Court and proceeds to dismiss the application seeking condonation of delay.

¶14

CRLRD No. 364 of 2026

¶15

¶16

Accordingly, this application is rejected.

¶17

Order on Criminal Revision

¶18

Since application seeking condonation of delay in filing this revision has been dismissed vide order of date, the revision being barred by limitation, is accordingly dismissed.

¶19

(Praveen Kumar Giri,J.)

¶20

April 20, 2026

¶21

DKS

¶22

Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTWA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sanjiv Kumar Kanaujiya v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjiv Kumar Kanaujiya v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Amit Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Dr Mohammad Shadab vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rajat Jaiswal vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Vibhore Kumar Rastogi Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Shambhu @ Shambhunath Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sanjiv Kumar Kanaujiya vs State of U.P. and 2 Others