Juvenile X Thru. His Father v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Revision dismissed for want of prosecution on non-appearance of parties when the case was called out; revision already listed as infructuous; single-judge order of Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench dated December 16, 2025; revisionist a juvenile represented through his father; State respondent represented by learned A.G.A.; no statute, precedent, issue or quantum involved; relevant only to procedural practice (dismissal for want of prosecution / infructuous listing), not to substantive law.
What did the court decide?
Since none appeared from either side when the matter was called out, only the learned A.G.A. being present for the State respondent, and the revision already standing fixed in the list of infructuous cases, the revision stands dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶12