Mohammed Ghufran Dehelvi v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ of mandamus for free and fair investigation dismissed as infructuous; charge sheet/police report under Section 193(3) BNSS forwarded during pendency of writ petition; no cause of action survives after filing of charge sheet; FIR dated 23.01.2026; Case Crime No. 43 of 2026; Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 329, 351(2), 351(3) BNS; Police Station Sahibabad, District Ghaziabad; statutory investigation under Chapter-XIII BNSS; petitioner was the first informant (Mohammed Ghufran Dehelvi); High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; division bench of Rajeev Misra, J. and Padam Narain Mishra, J.; decision dated May 7, 2026.
What did the court decide?
The charge sheet/police report in terms of Section 193(3) BNSS was forwarded by the Investigating Officer during the pendency of the writ petition; consequently, no cause of action survives with the petitioner to press the writ petition any further.