Dismissed¶17

Ravi Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC5 May 2026CRLP/10389/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 10389 of 2026, Ravi Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others, decided 06.05.2026 (Rajeev Misra, J. and Padam Narain Mishra, J.). Challenge to F.I.R. dated 30.11.2025, Case Crime No. 208 of 2025, sections 125 BNS and 25(9) Arms Act, P.S. Audyogik Kshetra, Prayagraj. Petitioner not named in F.I.R.; maintainability precedents cited (Hukum Chand Garg; Kulvant Singh; Priyanka Singh) but not decided. Petitioner arrested during pendency; petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim order vacated.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, the petitioner having been arrested during its pendency and having instructed counsel not to press it; the learned A.G.A. raised no objection. ¶17

Ravi Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10389 of 2026

¶2

Ravi Singh

¶3

.....Petitioner(s)

¶4

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others	.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Rishabh Kumar Pandey, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay : G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 49

¶6

HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J.

¶7

Heard Mr. Rishabh Kumar Pandey, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for State/respondents-1,2,3.

¶8

Perused the record.

¶9

Petitioner- Ravi Singh has approached this Court by means of present Criminal Misc. Writ Petition challenging the F.I.R. dated 30.11.2025, lodged by first informant Ramashankar Yadav and registered as Case Crime No. 208 of 2025, under sections 125 BNS, 25(9) Arms Act, Police StationAudyogik Kshetra, District- Prayagraj.

¶10

On the matter being taken up, the learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Therefore, he cannot mainitian the present writ petition. As such, present writ petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of maintainability.

¶11

To lend legal support to their submission, they have relied upon judgement and order dated 7.2.2022, passed by the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No. 762 of 2020 ( Hukum Chand Garg and Another vs. the State of U.P.) as well as the order dated 27.2.2025, passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3869 of 2025 (Kulvant Singh Vs. State of U.P.) and order dated 9.1.2023, passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 235 of 2023 (Priyanka Singh Vs. State of U.P. and 2 Others). They therefore submit that in view of above, the present writ petition is liable to be dismissed as being not maintainable.

¶12

When confronted with above, the learned counsel for petitioner submits that

¶13

CRLP No. 10389 of 2026

¶14

¶15

petitioner has been arrested during the pendency of present writ petition. He, therefore, contends that he has received instructions not to press this writ petition. As such present writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn.

¶16

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner.

¶17

In view of above, this writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

¶18

Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.

¶19

May 6, 2026 Arshad

¶20

(Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.)

¶21

Digitally signed by :- ARSHAD MAHMOOD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ravi Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Narendra Bansal Vs State of Up and 5 Others

Smt Bhoori Begam Vs State of Up and 7 Others

Harish Chahar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Pradeep @ Guddu vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others

Harish Chahar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Poonam Bharti vs State of U.P. and 2 Others