Dismissed¶17

Smt Bhoori Begam v. State of Up and 7 Others

Allahabad HC4 May 2026CRLP/10117/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 10117 of 2026, decided May 5, 2026 (Rajeev Misra, J. and Padam Narain Mishra, J.). First informant's petition for mandamus to conclude investigation of Case Crime No. 45 of 2026 under Sections 115(2), 70(1), 351(3) of BNS, P.S. Ujhani, District Budaun (FIR dated 08.02.2026); A.G.A. objected that petition filed within three months of FIR was premature/misconceived; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh at appropriate stage; interim order, if any, vacated. Keywords: writ of mandamus, conclusion of investigation, premature writ petition, BNS 2023 offences, withdrawal with liberty, interim order vacated.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh writ petition at the appropriate stage if necessary; interim order, if any, vacated. ¶17

Smt Bhoori Begam Vs State of Up and 7 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10117 of 2026

¶3

Smt Bhoori Begam

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Up And 7 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Amir Khan
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 49

¶10

HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J.

¶11

Heard Mr. Amir Khan, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned A.G.A. representing State-respondents 1 to 4.

¶12

Perused the record.

¶13

Petitioner-Smt Bhoori Begam has approached this Court by means of present criminal misc. writ petition for a writ of mandamus commanding respondent- 2 to direct the subordinate officer to conclude investigation of Case Crime No. 45 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 70(1), 351(3) of BNS, Police Station- Ujhani, District- Budaun, arising out the FIR dated 08.02.2026 lodged by first-informant- Smt Bhoori Begam writ petitioner.

¶14

At the very outset, learned A.G.A. representing State-respondents 1 to 4 fairly submits that petitioner has approached this Court even before an expiry of a period of three months from the date of lodging of impugned FIR. As such the present writ petition is misconceived at this stage and therefore, liable to be dismissed.

¶15

When confronted with above, the learned counsel for petitioner fairly submits that present writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn at this stage with liberty to file fresh at appropriate stage if necessary.

¶16