Dismissed¶19

Kumari Neha Pal v. Dr. Ramesh Chandra, C.M.O.

Contempt – compliance with writ Court's direction

Allahabad HC6 May 2026CAPL/4801/2024

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt application dismissed — compliance with writ direction — family pension claim by adopted daughter of deceased Class IV employee (late Ramwati, Community Health Center, Bewar, Mainpuri, died 01.07.2016) — GPF paid, leave encashment for 300 days, insurance claim paid — permission for gratuity Rs. 5,09,950/- and family pension — no case for contempt made out — bailable warrant discharged — Dr. Ramesh Chandra Gupta, Chief Medical Officer, Mainpuri — Writ-A No. 5657 of 2023 — Allahabad High Court — Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.

What did the court decide?

No case for contempt made out; contempt application dismissed and bailable warrant issued against the opposite party discharged. ¶19

Kumari Neha Pal Vs Dr. Ramesh Chandra, C.M.O. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4801 of 2024

¶3

Kumari Neha Pal

¶4

	Versus	...	..Applicant(s)
Dr. Ramesh Chandra, C.M.O.			.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: :	Sanjeev Kumar	Yadav

¶5

Court No. - 9

¶6

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

¶7

Dr. Ramesh Chandra Gupta, Chief Medical Officer, Mainpuri is present in the Court today, who is identified by Sri Pavan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel.

¶8

A compliance affidavit has been filed today, which is taken on record.

¶9

The writ Court had required the opposite party to decide the representation of the applicant, in case it was filed. The order of writ Court on 2.5.2023 passed in Writ-A No. 5657 of 2023 is as follows;

¶10

"Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel.

¶11

The petitioner is adopted daughter of late Ramwati, who was working as Class IV employee posted at Comunnity Health Center, Bewar, Mainpuri.

¶12

It is submitted that Late Ramwati has died on 01.07.2016 and the petitioner being adopted daughter of late Ramwati is entitled to family pension but the same has not been released and in this respect, she has made several representations to the respondents-authorities, but till date, no action has been taken on the same.

¶13

Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to respondent No.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶14

CAPL No. 4801 of 2024

¶15

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation before the respondent No.3- Chief Medical Officer, Mainpuri along with the certified copy of this order raising all her grievance within a period of three weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the same by reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months thereafter."

¶17

In paragraph no. 8 of the compliance affidavit filed today it has been stated that GPF amount has been paid to the applicant, while in paragraph no. 9 the amount paid in lieu of leave encashment for 300 days has been mentioned, in paragraph no. 10 the insurance claim paid to the application has also been disclosed, while in paragraph no. 11 it has been stated that permission has been granted for payment of gratuity amounting to Rs. 5,09,950/- and family pension in favour of the applicant.

¶18

As the requisite payments have been made by the opposite party to the applicant, representation of the application stands decided and no case for contempt is made out.

¶19

Contempt application stands dismissed. Bailable warrant issued against the opposite party stands discharged.

¶20

(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)

¶21

May 7, 2026 Shekhar

¶22

Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kumari Neha Pal v. Dr. Ramesh Chandra, C.M.O.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumari Neha Pal v. Dr. Ramesh Chandra, C.M.O.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Girish Chandra Dubey Vs Dr. Pawan Kumar Arun, Director General Medical & Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan and Another

Vijay Shankar Yadav Vs Shri Anupam Mishra

Arun Kumar Pandey Vs Shrikrishn Upadhyay, Assistant Development Officer (Panchayat) Vikas Khand Majhawan

Javed Iqbal vs Shri Satyendra Kumar Posted as District Magistrate and 4 Others

Neeraj Kumar Singh Vs Shri P. Guru Prasad Principal Secretary, Nagar Vikas VIBHAG-4 and 2 Others

Rahul Arora and Another Vs Sri Satyendra Kumar and 5 Others