Disposed¶19

Vijay Shankar Yadav v. Shri Anupam Mishra

Allahabad HC5 May 2026CAPL/3024/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Court No. 9, Rohit Ranjan Agarwal J.; CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) / CAPL No. 3024 of 2026, decided May 6, 2026; civil contempt for non-compliance of writ court order dated 28.1.2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 40218 of 2025; prima facie case found; no notice issued; three months' further time granted to comply from certified copy; applicant Vijay Shankar Yadav v. opposite party Shri Anupam Mishra; liberty to re-approach on default; application disposed of at this stage.

What did the court decide?

Contempt application finally disposed of at this stage without issuing notice; opposite party granted three months' further time to comply with the writ court order dated 28.1.2026 from production of a certified copy; liberty reserved to the applicant to approach the Court again in case of non-compliance. ¶19

Vijay Shankar Yadav Vs Shri Anupam Mishra — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶19

Issue for consideration

Whether the opposite party is liable to be punished for willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 28.1.2026 passed by the Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 40218 of 2025.

¶9

Ratio / Principle

Prima facie, a case has been made out for punishing the opposite party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order passed in the aforesaid writ petition.

¶11

Key takeaways

No notice was issued to the opposite party at this stage; the opposite party was granted three months' further time to comply with the order dated 28.1.2026 from the date of production of a certified copy of the contempt order.ratio¶12
The applicant was directed to supply a duly stamped registered envelope addressed to the opposite parties and another self-addressed envelope to the office within two weeks, for transmission of the order and contempt application.ratio¶13
In case the opposite party does not comply with the order, it would be open to the applicant to approach the Court again.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Contempt application (civil) alleging willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 28.1.2026 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 40218 of 2025, served on the opposite party through registered post on 31.1.2026 without compliance. Held: a prima facie case for punishment was made out, but no notice was issued at this stage; the opposite party was granted three months' further time to comply with the writ court order from the date of production of a certified copy of the contempt order. The applicant was to supply stamped registered and self-addressed envelopes within two weeks for transmission of the order and contempt application, with liberty to re-approach the Court in case of non-compliance. Application finally disposed of at this stage.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3024 of 2026

¶3

Vijay Shankar Yadav

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus Shri Anupam Mishra .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Chaudhary, Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :

¶6

Court No. - 9

¶7

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

The present contempt application has been filed for punishing the Opposite Party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 28.1.2026 passed by this Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 40218 of 2025.

¶10

It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant had filed the aforesaid writ petition, which was disposed of vide order dated 28.1.2026. Copy of the order was served through registered post on 31.1.2026 but till date the order of writ Court has not been complied with.

¶11

Prima facie, a case has been made out for punishing the opposite party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order passed in the aforesaid writ petition.

¶12

However, no notice is issued to the opposite party at this stage. The opposite party is granted three months further time to comply with the order dated 28.1.2026 passed by this Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 40218 of 2025 from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

¶13

The applicant shall supply a duly stamped registered envelope addressed to the opposite parties and another self-addressed envelope to

¶14

CAPL No. 3024 of 2026

¶15

¶16

the office within two weeks from today. The office shall send a copy of this order along with the self-addressed envelope of the applicant with a copy of contempt application to the opposite parties within one week thereafter and keep a record thereof.

¶17

The opposite party shall comply with the directions of the writ court and intimate the applicant the order through the self-addressed envelop within a week thereafter.

¶18

In case, the opposite party does not comply with the order, it would be open to the applicant to approach this court again.

¶19

With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed of at this stage.

¶20

(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)

¶21

May 6, 2026

¶22

Shekhar

¶23

Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vijay Shankar Yadav v. Shri Anupam Mishra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Shankar Yadav v. Shri Anupam Mishra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Anita Pandey Vs Sri Mangala Prasad Singh, District Magistrate

Smt Neelam Singh Vs Sri Radha Krishna Tiwari,Deputy Director of Education and Another

Jagdish Prasad Sharma and 37 Others Vs Sri L Venketesharlu, Chief/Additional Chief Secretary

Committee of Management Jhahuwa Vs Prof Bihari Lal Sharma Vice Chancellor, Sampoornanand Sanskrit University Varanasi and Another

Aman Tyagi Vs Smt.Kavita Meena

Jayram Singh Vs Shri Pratap Singh Baghel