Dismissed¶14

Ravi Verma and 21 Others v. Naveen Kumar Pathak Distt. Basic Edu. Officer Barabanki

Allahabad HC6 May 2026CAPL/1847/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt application dismissed on compliance affidavit; payment pursuant to Writ Court order dated 11.02.2026 in Writ-A No. 1497 of 2026 to be made within eight weeks after uploading requisite information; opposite party Naveen Kumar Pathak, District Basic Education Officer, Barabanki; liberty to applicants to revive contempt if amount not credited; notice discharged; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Saurabh Lavania, J.; decided May 25, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the applicants to revive the contempt proceedings if the amount directed by the Writ Court's order dated 11.02.2026 in Writ-A No. 1497 of 2026 is not credited in their accounts within eight weeks; notice discharged. ¶14

Ravi Verma and 21 Others vs Naveen Kumar Pathak Distt. Basic Edu. Officer Barabanki — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1847 of 2026

¶3

Ravi Verma And 21 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

Naveen Kumar Pathak Distt. Basic Edu. Officer Barabanki

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Vimal Kuma	Kumar, r Bajpai	Animesh Bajpai, Jitendra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Uday	Veer Singh

¶9

Court No. - 7

¶10

HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

¶11

Heard.

¶12

The affidavit of compliance filed by Dr. Uday Veer Singh, Advocate, who appeared for the opposite party/contemnor, after serving a copy thereof upon the applicants' counsel in the Court today is taken on record.

¶13

Based upon the aforesaid affidavit, it is stated by Dr. Uday Veer Singh, Advocate, who appeared for the opposite party/contemnor, that in terms of the order of Writ Court dated 11.02.2026 passed in Writ-A No. 1497 of 2026 the actual payment would be made to the applicants within a period of eight weeks after uploading relevant/requisite information and therefore the instant contempt application/petition is liable to be dismissed granting liberty to the applicants to revive it if the amount is not credited in their accounts within the said period.

¶14

Taking note of the aforesaid statement, the instant contempt application/petition stands dismissed . It is however with liberty to the applicants to revive the instant contempt proceedings if the amount, as aforesaid, is not credited in their accounts within the aforesaid period.

¶15

Notice stands discharged.

¶16

May 25, 2026 Jyoti/-

¶17

(Saurabh Lavania,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ravi Verma and 21 Others v. Naveen Kumar Pathak Distt. Basic Edu. Officer Barabanki

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Verma and 21 Others v. Naveen Kumar Pathak Distt. Basic Edu. Officer Barabanki

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Amar Singh and 5 Others vs Smt. Aparna Upadhyay Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 2 Others

Satnam Singh vs Smt. Durga Sakthi Nagpal, Distt. Magistrate, Lakhimpur Kheri

Raj Nand Tripathi @ Rajnand vs Shri Sanjeev Singh Working as Director Samaj Kalyan Vibhag Sitting at Kalyan Bhavan Lko.

U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research Thru. Its Dir. Vishnu Kumar Shukla and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy., Labour Govt. of U.P. Lko. and Another

Rudra Pratap vs Sri Shubham Shukla, Distt. Basic Edu. Officer Distt. Balrampur

Dashrath Prasad Jaiswal vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 4 Others