Disposed¶19

Ramesh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC6 Jan 2026BAIL/45636/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application interim order; trial status report called from trial court; date of charge framing; prosecution witnesses proposed and examined; witness presence and adjournment reasons; counter affidavit time granted to A.G.A.; rejoinder affidavit; next date 04.02.2026; Allahabad High Court; Krishan Pahal, J.; Ramesh v. State of U.P.; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 45636 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim directions only in the pending bail application: Trial Judge to submit a tabulated trial-status report; two weeks' time to A.G.A. for counter affidavit with rejoinder within a week thereafter; matter listed on 04.02.2026. Bail application not decided on merits. ¶19

Ramesh vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶19

Issue for consideration

What is the current status of the trial of the present case (date of charge framing, prosecution witnesses proposed and examined, and instances of witness presence and adjournments with reasons)?

¶12

Court's answer

The learned Trial Judge is directed to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, covering the date of charge framing, number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed, witnesses examined with dates, and instances of witness presence and adjournments with reasons; the details need not be sent if the trial has been decided, in which case the date of disposal and result are to be mentioned.

¶12

Ratio / Principle

Two weeks' time is granted to the learned A.G.A. to file counter affidavit; rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.

¶18

Key takeaways

The matter is to be listed on 04.02.2026 in the daily cause list along with the report.ratio¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Krishan Pahal, J.), Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 45636 of 2025, Ramesh v. State of U.P., order dated January 6, 2026 — Interim order in a pending bail application. The learned Trial Judge was directed to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, stating (i) the date of framing of charge, (ii) number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet, (iii) names and number of prosecution witnesses examined with dates, and (iv) the number of times the witness was present and the case adjourned with reasons; such details were dispensed with if the trial stood decided, the date of disposal and result sufficing. Two weeks' time was granted to the learned A.G.A. to file a counter affidavit, with rejoinder, if any, within a week thereafter. The matter was directed to be listed on 04.02.2026 in the daily cause list along with the report. No decision was rendered on the merits of the bail application; no statute or precedent was cited.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45636 of 2025

Ramesh

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Umair Alam
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 66

¶10

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

¶11

List has been revised. Learned counsel for the applicant is present.

¶12

Learned Trial Judge concerned shall forthwith send a fresh report regarding the status of the trial of the present case with the following details in tabulated form:-

¶13

(i) Date on which the charge was framed.

¶14

(ii) Number and particulars (i.e. name, nature of witness like eye witness and expert witness etc.) of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet.

¶15

(iii) Names and number of prosecution witnesses who have been examined before the trial court with dates.

¶16

(iv) Number of times the witness was present and the case was adjourned along with the reason for the adjournment.

¶17

(v) The trial court need not send the aforesaid details, if the trial has been decided, but the date of disposal and the result be mentioned.

¶18

Learned A.G.A. prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.

¶19

List on 04.02.2026 in the daily cause list alongwith the report.

¶20

A copy of this order be communicated to the learned Trial Judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.

¶21

(Krishan Pahal,J.)

¶22

January 6, 2026

¶23

(Ravi Kant)

¶24

Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramesh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Chaudhary vs State of U.P.

Ramlakhan vs State of U.P.

Pushpendra vs State of U.P.

Sanjay vs State of U.P.

Ajit vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ashwani Singh @ Nikhil Singh vs State of U.P. and 3 Others