Disposed¶17

Ramlakhan v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC5 Jan 2026BAIL/42365/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court order in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 42365 of 2025, Ramlakhan v. State of U.P. (Krishan Pahal, J., 05.01.2026): direction to trial court for fresh trial status report in tabulated form; date of framing of charge; prosecution witnesses proposed per charge sheet; witnesses examined with dates; adjournment reasons; listing on 27.01.2026; communication via Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX; counsel for applicant absent; no decision on bail merits; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

No decision on the bail application on merits; directions issued to the learned Trial Judge to submit a fresh status report on the trial, and the matter listed on 27.01.2026 along with the report. ¶17

Ramlakhan vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

No decision on the bail application on merits; directions issued to the learned Trial Judge to submit a fresh status report on the trial, and the matter listed on 27.01.2026 along with the report.

¶17

Issue for consideration

Status and progress of the trial of the present case, including the date of framing of charge and the examination of prosecution witnesses, in the context of the pending bail application.

¶11

Court's answer

The learned Trial Judge concerned was directed to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, covering (i) the date of framing of charge, (ii) number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed as per the charge sheet, (iii) names and number of prosecution witnesses examined with dates, (iv) instances of witness presence and adjournments with reasons, and (v) if the trial is decided, the date of disposal and result.

¶11

Ratio / Principle

The matter was directed to be listed on 27.01.2026 in the daily cause list along with the report of the Trial Judge.

¶17

Key takeaways

A copy of the order was directed to be communicated to the learned Trial Judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.ratio¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Hon'ble Krishan Pahal, J.), Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 42365 of 2025, Ramlakhan v. State of U.P., order dated January 5, 2026: With the list revised and learned counsel for the applicant absent, the Court directed the learned Trial Judge to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, detailing (i) the date of framing of charge; (ii) the number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet; (iii) the names and number of prosecution witnesses examined with dates; (iv) the number of times the witness was present and the case adjourned, with reasons; and (v) if the trial stands decided, the date of disposal and result. The matter was listed for 27.01.2026 in the daily cause list along with the report, and a copy of the order was to be communicated to the Trial Judge through the District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX. The bail application was not decided on merits.

Ramlakhan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramlakhan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Badal vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shakir and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Santlal Gaur and 2 Others vs State of U.P.

Ajay Chaudhary vs State of U.P.

Pushpendra vs State of U.P.

Arjun vs State of U.P.