Pushpendra v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application where the High Court sought a fresh trial-status report from the trial court covering charge-framing date, prosecution witnesses proposed and examined, and adjournments with reasons; allowed the State two weeks for its counter affidavit and listed the matter with the report. No decision was made on the bail prayer.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45573 of 2025
Pushpendra
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramesh Kumar Shukla, Vivek Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 66
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
- List has been revised. Learned counsel for the applicant is present.
- Learned Trial Judge concerned shall forthwith send a fresh report regarding the status of the trial of the present case with the following details in tabulated form:-
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pushpendra
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/45573/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court