Ajay Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Order permitting the applicant to array the victim as Respondent No. 5 in a criminal bail application. Notice issued to respondents for an early date. Applicant granted three days for taking steps. Listing directed for June 2026.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3319 of 2026
Ajay Kumar
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Raziullah, Zartab Qamar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
- Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that due to inadvertent mistake the victim has been left to be arrayed as respondent in the bail application and he prays to implead the victim as Respondent No.5 during course of the day.
- Learned A.G.A. has no objection for the aforesaid prayer.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ajay Kumar
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others
Coram
Manish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/3319/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sonu Gupta vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others
Surendra Kumar Mishra @ Surendra Mishra and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Pratibha Thru. Her Husband Rishi @ Rishi Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 5 Others
Izhar Ali vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. of External Affairs New Delhi and 2 Others