Sachin v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim directions in bail matter — Sachin v. State of U.P. (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1145 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 13, Saurabh Lavania, J., order dated February 23, 2026): information to informant and victim through SHO concerned regarding pendency and date fixed; presence of informant and victim required before the Court on the date fixed; learned AGA to communicate order to SHO and file affidavit of proof on next listing; next date 10.03.2026; bail prayer undecided; no statutes or precedents cited; no costs or amounts.
What did the court decide?
Interim directions only; the bail prayer was not decided at this stage. SHO concerned to inform the informant and victim of the pendency of the case and the date fixed, and that their presence is required before the Court on that date; learned AGA to communicate the order to the SHO forthwith and place proof by affidavit when the case is listed next; application put up for 10.03.2026.