Dismissed¶11

Mohd. Wahid Khan v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC22 Apr 2026A482/45350/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mohd. Wahid Khan v. State of U.P. and Another; Allahabad High Court; Application U/S 482 No. 45350 of 2023; Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing application dismissed as not pressed on death of sole applicant; summoning order dated 30.11.2023; Complaint Case No. 1011 of 2023 (Nafisa Bano Vs. Sivan Akhtar and others); Sections 498-A, 323, 504 I.P.C.; Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; Police Station Chunar, District Mirzapur; Civil Judge (J.D.) / F.T.C. (Crime Against Women), Mirzapur; interim order vacated; order to be communicated to trial court within three weeks; Samit Gopal, J.; decided April 23, 2026.

What did the court decide?

The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed, as prayed, on account of the death of the sole applicant. ¶11

Mohd. Wahid Khan Vs State of U.P. and Another — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 45350 of 2023

¶2

Mohd. Wahid Khan

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava : G.A., Prashant Kumar Tripathi, Rajeev Kumar Tiwari

¶5

Court No. - 75

¶6

HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.

¶7

List revised.

¶8

Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.D. Ojha, learned counsel for the State and perused the records.

¶9

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant- Mohd. Wahid Khan, with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the impugned summoning order dated 30.11.2023 in Complaint Case No. 1011 of 2023 (Nafisa Bano Vs. Sivan Akhtar and others) under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Chunar, District Mirzapur, pending in the court of Civil Judge (J.D.) / F.T.C. (Crime Against Women), Mirzapur, with a further prayer that proceedings of the aforesaid case be stayed during the pendency of the present application.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the sole applicant- Mohd. Wahid Khan has died and thus the present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. be dismissed as not pressed.

¶11