Disposed¶14

Purnima @ Gudiya v. Kusum and 7 Others

Allahabad HC5 May 2026A227/6333/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 petition disposed of with direction for expeditious trial; Additional District Judge-13, Allahabad; Misc. Civil Case No.190/2024; Purnima @ Gudiya versus Kusum; speedy disposal of civil suit; service of notice; opportunity of hearing and evidence; no legal impediment condition; single judge Vikas Budhwar; decision dated May 6, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Additional District Judge-13, Allahabad to decide Misc. Civil Case No.190/2024 (Purnima @ Gudiya Versus Kusum) expeditiously, in accordance with law, after ensuring service of notice upon all respondents, opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties and reasonable opportunity to lead evidence, provided there is no other legal impediment. ¶14

Purnima @ Gudiya Vs Kusum and 7 Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶14

Issue for consideration

Whether a writ, order or direction should be issued to the Additional District Judge-13, Allahabad to decide Misc. Civil Case No.190/2024 (Purnima @ Gudiya Versus Kusum), pending before it, expeditiously.

¶12

Ratio / Principle

The writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Additional District Judge-13, Allahabad to decide Misc. Civil Case No.190/2024 (Purnima @ Gudiya Versus Kusum) in accordance with law, expeditiously, after ensuring service of notice upon all respondents, opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties and reasonable opportunity to lead evidence, provided there is no other legal impediment.

¶14

Key takeaways

Since the suit is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the petition pending.ratio¶13
Notices were not issued to the respondents in view of the order proposed to be passed that day.ratio¶10

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Vikas Budhwar, J.), in a matter under Article 227 filed by Purnima @ Gudiya against Kusum and 7 others, disposed of the petition seeking expeditious decision of Misc. Civil Case No.190/2024 (Purnima @ Gudiya Versus Kusum) pending before the Additional District Judge-13, Allahabad. The Court directed the trial court to decide the case in accordance with law, expeditiously, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents, providing opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties and a reasonable opportunity to lead evidence, provided there is no other legal impediment. Notices were not issued to the respondents in view of the order proposed to be passed, the Court observing that since the suit was pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the petition pending.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6333 of 2026

Purnima @ Gudiya

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

Kusum And 7 Others	.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Deena Nath, Himanshu Yadav, Shubham Yadav :

¶7

Court No. - 5

¶8

HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

¶9

Heard.

¶10

In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents.

¶11

The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition for a writ, order or direction to the Additional District Judge-13, Allahabad to decide the Misc. Civil Case No.190/2024 (Purnima @ Gudiya Versus Kusum), pending before it within stipulated time, as may deem fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court.

¶12

Learned counsel prayed that the said suit may be decided, expeditiously.

¶13

Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

¶14

In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Additional District Judge-13, Allahabad to decide the Misc. Civil Case No.190/2024 (Purnima @ Gudiya Versus Kusum), in accordance with law, expeditiously, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case, provided there is no other legal impediment.

¶15

May 6, 2026 Ashu

¶16

(Vikas Budhwar,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Purnima @ Gudiya v. Kusum and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Purnima @ Gudiya v. Kusum and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Sharad Kumari and 5 Others Vs Surendra Verma and 3 Others

Abhinav Anant and Another Vs Tata Capital Limited and 2 Others

Ata Husain and 7 Others Vs Gulam Naki and 4 Others

Asha Devi and 2 Others Vs Rajendra Prasad Singh

Chitra Sharma Vs Praveen Kumar Paliwal and Another

Jairam and Another Vs Union of India and 3 Others