Disposed¶16

Sriram Yadav v. Mishri and Another

Allahabad HC5 May 2026A227/6269/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 petition disposed of with directions for expeditious trial; Case No. 1219 of 2013 (Sriram Yadav Vs. Mishri); Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh; 6C application to be decided within eight months; no unnecessary adjournments; subject to legal impediment; notices not issued to respondents; single judge Vikas Budhwar; decided May 5, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh/Competent Civil Court to decide Case No. 1219 of 2013 (Sriram Yadav Vs. Mishri) expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournments, and to decide the 6C application filed in the suit during its pendency within eight months, in each case subject to legal impediment. ¶16

Sriram Yadav vs Mishri and Another — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6269 of 2026

¶3

Sriram Yadav

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

Mishri And Another			.....Res	pondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Madhu Dwivedi	Sudan	Dwivedi,	Shrawan
Counsel for Respondent(s)	:

¶7

Court No. - 5

¶8

HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

¶9

1. Heard.

¶10

In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents.

¶11

The present petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:-

¶12

" I) Issue an order or direction to the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh/Competent Civil Court to decide the case in Case No. 1219 of 2013 (Sriram Yadav Vs. Mishri) expeditiously within a short stipulated period of time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court pending in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh/Competent Civil Court.

¶13

II) To direct the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh/Competent Civil Court to decide the 6C application filed in aforesaid suit during the pendency of final disposal of the case No. 1219 of 2013 (Sriram Yadav Versus Mishri) ."

¶14

Learned counsel prayed that the said suit may be decided, expeditiously.

¶15

Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

¶16

In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh/Competent Civil Court to decide the case in Case No. 1219 of 2013 (Sriram Yadav Vs. Mishri), expeditiously without granting any unnecessary adjournments,

¶17

A227 No. 6269 of 2026

¶18

¶19

subject to legal impediment and further with a direction to Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh/Competent Civil Court to decide the 6C application filed in aforesaid suit during the pendency of final disposal of the case No. 1219 of 2013 (Sriram Yadav Versus Mishri) expeditiously, within a period of eight months, subject to legal impediment.

¶20

May 5, 2026 N.S.Rathour

¶21

(Vikas Budhwar,J.)

¶22

Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sriram Yadav v. Mishri and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sriram Yadav v. Mishri and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Sharad Kumari and 5 Others Vs Surendra Verma and 3 Others

Abhinav Anant and Another Vs Tata Capital Limited and 2 Others

Ata Husain and 7 Others Vs Gulam Naki and 4 Others

Asha Devi and 2 Others Vs Rajendra Prasad Singh

Jairam and Another Vs Union of India and 3 Others

Vindhyawasin Vs Smt. Pratima Pandey