Kismata Devi vs Nayab Tahsildar Dariyabad Tahsil Ramsanehighat Distt. Barabanki and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Kismata Devi vs Nayab Tahsildar Dariyabad Tahsil Ramsanehighat Distt. Barabanki and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Direction to respondent No. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Ramsanehighat, District Barabanki to decide Mutation Case No. T 202604120200451 (Old Case No. T 202004120200581) - Purnmasi Vs. Ganga Prasad, under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, preferably within three months from production of a certified copy of the order; parties directed to cooperate and refrain from unnecessary adjournments.

Issue for consideration

Whether respondent No. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Ramsanehighat, District Barabanki should be directed to decide Mutation Case No. T 202604120200451 (Old Case No. T 202004120200581) - Purnmasi Vs. Ganga Prasad, under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.

Court's answer

Without entering into the merits, respondent No. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Ramsanehighat, District Barabanki is directed to decide Mutation Case No. T 202604120200451 (Old Case No. T 202004120200581) - Purnmasi Vs. Ganga Prasad, under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.

Ratio / Principle

The decision is to be made preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.

Key takeaways

The parties to the mutation case shall cooperate in its expeditious disposal and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments; the court concerned shall not grant such adjournments except in exceptional circumstances.ratio¶16

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Alok Mathur, J. - Writ petition under Article 227 (Matters Under Article 227 No. 1196 of 2026) filed by Kismata Devi seeking a direction to respondent No. 1, Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Ramsanehighat, District Barabanki, to decide Mutation Case No. T 202604120200451 (Old Case No. T 202004120200581) - Purnmasi Vs. Ganga Prasad, under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. Without entering into the merits, the Court directed the Nayab Tehsildar to decide the mutation case expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Parties were directed to cooperate in expeditious disposal and not to seek unnecessary adjournments, which the court concerned shall not grant except in exceptional circumstances. Notice to private respondents was dispensed with. Writ petition disposed of (March 18, 2026).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1196 of 2026

Kismata Devi

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

Nayab Tahsildar Dariyabad Tahsil Ramsanehighat Distt. Barabanki And 2 Others

.....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Anil Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.
Court No.- 5

HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.

Heard Sri Anil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.

In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil - Ramsanehighat, District - Barabanki to decide Mutation Case No. T 202604120200451 (Old Case No. T 202004120200581) - Purnmasi Vs. Ganga Prasad, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil - Ramsanehighat, District - Barabanki, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil - Ramsanehighat, District - Barabanki, is directed to decide Mutation Case No. T 202604120200451 (Old Case No. T 202004120200581) - Purnmasi Vs. Ganga Prasad, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.

It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.

With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of .

March 18, 2026

A. Verma

(Alok Mathur,J.)

Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench