A writ tax petition by the U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission against GST and Central Excise authorities was listed for hearing after four weeks, with a previously granted interim order continuing until the next listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT TAX No. - 239 of 2024
U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission Thru. Secy. Lko.
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Addl. Commissioner Office Of Prin. Commissioner Central G.S.T. And Central Excise Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dwijendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dipak Seth, A.S.G.I., K D Nag
Court No. - 3
HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
(Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)
November 25, 2025
Satish
Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission Thru. Secy. Lko.
Addl. Commissioner Office Of Prin. Commissioner Central G.S.T. And Central Excise Lko.
Another
Shekhar B. Saraf
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
