Dismissed¶¶12

Iti Ltd. Mankapur Thru. Unit Head/Agm v. Presiding Officer Labour Court U.P. Faizabad and 20 Others

Allahabad HC13 Oct 2025WRIC/9846/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; WRIT - C No. 9846 of 2025; Iti Ltd Mankapur; Labour Court U.P. Faizabad order; writ maintainability Article 226 vs Article 227; preliminary objection; withdrawal with liberty to file fresh petition under Article 227; dismissed as not pressed; certified copies returned; Subhash Vidyarthi, J.; October 14, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution; certified copies and photocopies filed with the petition to be retained on record and returned to the petitioner's counsel. ¶¶12

Iti Ltd. Mankapur Thru. Unit Head/Agm vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 9846 of 2025

¶3

Iti Ltd Mankapur Thru. Unit Head/Agm

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

Presiding Officer Labour Court U.P. Faizabad And 20 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dwijendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Pratap Singh, Pankaj Kumar Singh

¶7

Court No. - 17

¶8

HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

¶9

यािचकाकतार् के िवद्वान अिधवक्ता श्री िद्वजेन्द्र िमश्रा, िवद्वान अपर मुख्य स्थायी अिधवक्ता श्री पंकज श्रीवास्तव तथा िवपक्षी संख्या 2, 3, 6-10, 12 एवं 19 के िवद्वान अिधवक्ता श्री अजय प्रताप िसह तथा िवपक्षी संख्या 16 के िवद्वान अिधवक्ता श्री पंकज कुमार को सुना तथा पत्रावली का अवलोकन िकया।

¶10

िवद्वान अिधवक्ता श्री अजय प्रताप िसह ने प्रारंिभक आपित्त करते हुए कथन िकया िक श्रम न्यायालय के आदेश के िवरुद्ध भारतीय संिवधान के अनुच्छेद 226 के अंतगर्त िरट यािचका पोषणीय नहीं होगी तथा यह यािचका भारतीय संिवधान के अनुच्छेद 227 के अंतगर्त पोषणीय होगी।

¶11

उक्त आपित्त के उत्तर में यािचकाकतार् के िवद्वान अिधवक्ता ने कहा िक वह यािचका पर बल नहीं देना चाहते हैं तथा वह अनुच्छेद 227 के अंतगर्त एक नवीन यािचका प्रस्तुत करने की अनुमित चाहते हैं।

¶12

तद्नुसार, उपरोक्त अनुमित के साथ यािचका बल न िदये जाने के आधार पर िनरस्त की जाती है।

¶13

यािचका के साथ प्रस्तुत प्रमािणत प्रितयां, छायाप्रितयां अिभलेख पर रखते हुए यािचकाकतार् के िवद्वान अिधवक्ता को वापस कर दी जायें।

¶14

(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)

¶15

October 14, 2025

¶16

Ankit

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Iti Ltd. Mankapur Thru. Unit Head/Agm v. Presiding Officer Labour Court U.P. Faizabad and 20 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Iti Ltd. Mankapur Thru. Unit Head/Agm v. Presiding Officer Labour Court U.P. Faizabad and 20 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Prakash Mahavdiyalya, Etah Thru. Manager Rakesh Kumar Bhardwaj and 13 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Technical Education U.P. Lko. and 3 Others

Mohd. Atif Khan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 3 Others

Janki Prasad Verma Memorial Shikshan Sansthan Thru.Authorized Signatory/Secy. Dr.Radhey Lal Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Prin. Deptt. Medical Health Family Welfare Lko. and 3 Others

Thakur Prasad vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. and 11 Others

Ram Udit vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food and Civil Supplies U.P. Lko. and 5 Others

Amar Nath Trivedi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Sectt. Lko and 3 Others