Petitioner sought mandamus directing authorities to act against a party and decide pending representations concerning a private dispute over Gata Nos. 505, 504 and 405. The court held such private disputes belong in the revenue court's domain and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 8898 of 2025
Ram Rup
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
District Magistrate, Bahraich And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
"I. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the opposite parties to take proper action against the Opposite party no. 4.
II. issue a writ order or direction in nature of mandamus to directing the Opposite party no. 1 and 2 to decide the applications/representations dated-18.08.2025 of petitioner pending before the Opposite party no. 1 and 2, contained as Annexure No. 4 & 5 to this writ petition."
WRIC No. 8898 of 2025
2
(Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.)
September 10, 2025 Anupam S/-
Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Should the District Magistrate be directed to act against opposite party no. 4 and decide pending representations regarding a private land dispute?
Ram Rup
District Magistrate, Bahraich
Sangeeta Chandra
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
