Smt. Nahid Fatma v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Family register inclusion challenged as summary proceeding; writ petition disposed with liberty to seek declaration of status by civil suit. Keywords: inclusion of name in family register; summary proceedings; Sadasyata Praman Patra; Tehsildar Sadar Prayagraj; certiorari; mandamus; family pension; gratuity; retiral benefits; declaration of status; alternative remedy of suit; impugned order abides by suit decision. Parties: Smt. Nahid Fatma (petitioner) v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others (respondents). Advocates: Hanuman Kinkar, Lalit Ojha (petitioner); C.S.C. (respondents). No statute or precedent cited. Neutral citation 2025:AHC:31048.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to approach the court of competent jurisdiction for declaration of her status; upon filing of any such suit, the impugned order shall abide by the decision in the suit.