Mohammad Saqib vs State of U.P. and Another

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30025

Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6201 of 2025

Petitioner :- Mohammad Saqib Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Pandey,D.K.Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

¶7

The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:

¶8

"(a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to sanction him Arms license of DBBL 12 Bore Gun No.A/7-7473/4176 and license No.6595/P.S. Puramufti to the petitioner on account of family heir loom in pursuant application dated 28.08.2024.

¶9

(b). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.2 to decide the application dated 28.08.2024 filed by the petitioner accordingly to law."

¶10

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has applied for grant of arms licence before the respondent no. 2 in the year 2024 however, till date the aforesaid application of the petitioner has not been decided by the concerned authority.

¶11

It is to be seen that before this Court large number of petitions are being filed for directing the licencing authorities to consider the application for grant/renewal of arms licence of the applicants. The aforesaid large number of petitions are indicative of the fact that licencing authorities are not considering the applications for grant/renewal of arms licence in a time bound manner. The same may be indicative of red tapism, negligence or corrupt practices. The applications of the citizens are required to be considered by the authorities in a time bound manner so that citizens do not face any difficulty on account of pendency of their applications.

¶12

Learned Standing Counsel submits that application of the petitioner for grant of arms licence would be decided in a time bound manner.

¶13

Considering the circumstances of the case and the fact that application of the petitioner for grant of arms licence is pending consideration before the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Prayagraj, it is hereby directed that application for grant of arms licence of the petitioner shall be decided by the licencing authority within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. It is hereby also provided that in the event the aforesaid application of the petitioner for grant of arms licence is not disposed of within the period herein above granted, the petitioner would be entitled to cost/compensation @ Rs.100/per day (for each day delay after two months) which is to be paid by the respondent no. 2 at the first instance and the same would be recoverable by the respondent no. 2 from the salary of the erring officials. This cost/compensation is in addition to the other legal remedies available to the petitioner including the enforcement of the present order, accordance with law.

¶14

With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶15

Order Date :- 4.3.2025 D. Tamang

¶16

Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohammad Saqib v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Saqib v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vikram Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Vijay Singh vs Senior / Chief Manager, Indian Overseas Bank and 2 Others

Gajendra Singh vs Baroda Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank and Another

Vijay Narayan Rai vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Ram Shankar Tiwari vs State of U.P. and Another

Shivam Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another