Petitioner sought compensation under agricultural injury scheme, rejected due to unverified report claiming deceased was a non-agriculturist. Court set aside rejection for non-application of mind and remanded matter for fresh inquiry.
Rejection of compensation claim set aside; matter remanded for fresh inquiry within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 40398 of 2025
Chandrakali
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
WRIC No. 40398 of 2025
2
afresh on the basis of affidavit given by the land owner Pradeep Kumar after conducting afresh inquiry. Let the entire exercise be done within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order.
November 26, 2025 rkg
(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether compensation claim for farmland injury was rightly rejected based on a perfunctory report lacking material particulars.
Chandrakali
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Atul Sreedharan
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
