Petitioner sought a direction that his conciliation application against respondent no.3, pending before respondent no.2, be decided in accordance with law. The Court disposed of the petition permitting a fresh representation, to be decided within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 39163 of 2025
Manoj Kumar Gupta
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Syed Wajid Ali .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C., Vivek Ratan Agrawal |
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
(Arun Kumar,J.)
November 18, 2025
Ashok Kr.
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the authority considering the petitioner's pending conciliation application can be directed to decide it in accordance with law?
Manoj Kumar Gupta
State Of U.P.
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Arun Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
