Writ petition challenging an order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act was held not maintainable; the court directed the petitioner to the Debts Recovery Tribunal and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17317-DB
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2712 of 2025
Petitioner :- Raja Respondent :- Distt. Magistrate, Distt. Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Heard.
The petitioner challenges an order passed under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The Writ Petition is not maintainable. Remedy, if any, is before the Debts Recovery Tribunal concerned.
The Writ Petition stands disposed of.
( Om Prakash Shukla,J. ) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 26.3.2025 Saurabh
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Is a writ petition maintainable against an order passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raja
Distt. Magistrate, Distt. Lko
Rajan Roy
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
