Dismissed¶9

Sanjay Kumar Sahu v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC11 Sept 2025WRIC/26145/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sanjay Kumar Sahu v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others; WRIT-C No. 26145 of 2025; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; bench: Arindam Sinha J. and Avnish Saxena J.; decided 11 September 2025; subject: withdrawal of petitioner's security, prayer to restrain withdrawal, liberty to file fresh writ petition; outcome: writ petition dismissed as petitioner had subsequent fresh cause of action; counsel for petitioner: Rishabh Kesarwani, Shrish Chandra Pandey; counsel for State: Raj Mohan Upadhyay (Additional Chief Standing Counsel), C.S.C.; no statutes or cases cited.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed because the petitioner has a subsequent fresh cause of action. ¶9

Sanjay Kumar Sahu vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 26145 of 2025

¶3

Sanjay Kumar Sahu

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others	.....Resp	ondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Rishabh Kesarwani, Shiva Shrish Chandra	Pandey,
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.
Court No.- 39

¶6

HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

¶7

Mr. Shrish Chandra, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, on apprehension that his client's security will be withdrawn, the writ petition was filed. Prayer was to restrain the withdrawal. The security has since been withdrawn before the petition could be moved. In the circumstances he prays for liberty to his client to file fresh writ petition.

¶8