Saiyddin v. State of Up and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Non-substantive listing order: the writ petition could not be taken up due to paucity of time and was directed to be listed on 04.03.2025, with the interim order granted earlier continuing till the next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 683 of 2024
Petitioner :- Saiyddin Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlakar Pal,Shiv Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shive Datta Yadav
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
Due to paucity of time, the matter could not be taken up.
List in the additional cause list on 04.03.2025 .
Interim order, granted earlier, shall continue to remain in operation till the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 4.2.2025 Prashant D.
Digitally signed by :- PRASHANT DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Saiyddin
- respondent
State Of Up
Coram
J.J. Munir
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/683/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court