Dismissed¶12

Vivek Pathak v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food and Civil Supply Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC1 Aug 2025WRIA/8569/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WRIT - A No. - 8569 of 2025, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW (Court No. - 7), Hon'ble Manish Mathur, J., December 2, 2025: Vivek Pathak v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Supply Lko. And 3 Others — petition seeking retiral dues of petitioner's father dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh owing to inadvertently omitted pleadings/documents. Counsel: Awadhesh Kumar Tiwari (petitioner); C.S.C., Awadhesh Kumar Tiwari, Kaushlendra Tewari (respondents). No statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh petition (dismissed as withdrawn) ¶12

Vivek Pathak vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food and Civil Supply Lko. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 8569 of 2025

Vivek Pathak

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Supply Lko. And 3 Others	Food And Civil .....Respo	ndent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Awadhesh Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C., Awadhesh Kumar Kaushlendra Tewari	Tiwari,

¶7

Court No. - 7

¶8

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.

¶10

Petition had earlier been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to pay retiral dues of father of petitioner.

¶11

It has been submitted that inadvertently, certain relevant pleadings and documents could not be made or annexed to the petition due to which fresh petition is required to be filed.

¶12

In view thereof, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file afresh.

¶13

(Manish Mathur,J.)

¶14

December 2, 2025

¶15

kvg/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vivek Pathak v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food and Civil Supply Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vivek Pathak v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food and Civil Supply Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sakshee Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Child Development and Nutrition Lko. and 4 Others

Bobi and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Horticulture Lko. and 2 Others

Nisha Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Pushtahar Lko and 6 Others

Ram Nath and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Horticulture U.P. Lko. and 2 Others

Ruchi Verma and 120 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical Health Family Welfare Lko. and 24 Others

Shalini Dubey Alias Shalini and 29 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical Health Family Welfare Lko. and 10 Others