The petitioner failed to appear. The Court found the writ petition infructuous due to loss of interest over time and consigned it to the record, discharging any interim order.
Writ petition con-signed to record as infructuous; interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23055
Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6090 of 2006 Petitioner :- Mohd. Irfan Respondent :- Zila Prashashnic Committee Thru Member /Secy. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- S.C. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,I.P. Singh,Sudeep Seth
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
List revised. Case called out. None has appeared for the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the respondents are present.
It appears that by efflux of time, the petitioner has lost interest in the matter to pursue the case as such this petition has rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition being infructuous is consigned to record.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 Pks
Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mohd. Irfan
Zila Prashashnic Committee
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
